<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90516</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal applied a prima facie assessment of the recorded statements and the respective roles of the authorised signatory, excise clerk, sales assistant and commission agent. On that basis, it found sufficient involvement to justify partial pre-deposit as a condition for interim relief. Compliance with the directed deposit entitled the appellants to waiver of the balance penalty and protection from recovery pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90516</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal applied a prima facie assessment of the recorded statements and the respective roles of the authorised signatory, excise clerk, sales assistant and commission agent. On that basis, it found sufficient involvement to justify partial pre-deposit as a condition for interim relief. Compliance with the directed deposit entitled the appellants to waiver of the balance penalty and protection from recovery pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>