<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90503</link>
    <description>Winding wires made from copper wire rods were held eligible for Notification No. 47/84-C.E. because the specified input had effectively suffered the required duty, including where wire bars were first converted into wire rods before use in the final product. The existence of an intermediate manufacturing stage did not break the chain between the duty-paid input and the exempted goods. The settled principle was also applied that goods exempted from duty, or cleared on a nil duty basis, can satisfy a notification condition requiring prior payment of appropriate duty. On that basis, the exemption was upheld and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90503</link>
      <description>Winding wires made from copper wire rods were held eligible for Notification No. 47/84-C.E. because the specified input had effectively suffered the required duty, including where wire bars were first converted into wire rods before use in the final product. The existence of an intermediate manufacturing stage did not break the chain between the duty-paid input and the exempted goods. The settled principle was also applied that goods exempted from duty, or cleared on a nil duty basis, can satisfy a notification condition requiring prior payment of appropriate duty. On that basis, the exemption was upheld and the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>