<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90496</link>
    <description>Strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was not accepted in full; the appellant was required to deposit part of the duty and penalty within 12 weeks. On such deposit, the pre-deposit obligation would stand dispensed with and recovery would remain stayed pending the appeal. The operative effect was a conditional waiver, preserving the appellant&#039;s appeal rights while securing partial payment as a safeguard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90496</link>
      <description>Strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was not accepted in full; the appellant was required to deposit part of the duty and penalty within 12 weeks. On such deposit, the pre-deposit obligation would stand dispensed with and recovery would remain stayed pending the appeal. The operative effect was a conditional waiver, preserving the appellant&#039;s appeal rights while securing partial payment as a safeguard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>