<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90495</link>
    <description>Exemption benefit could not be denied merely because the assessee had not obtained a licence or followed the prescribed procedure, where the record indicated bona fide ignorance and no intent to evade duty; the demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable. The extended period under section 11A also could not be invoked because the department failed to prove suppression, misstatement, fraud, or deliberate evasion, and the transactions had been accounted for. On both the exemption and limitation issues, the finding was in favour of the assessee and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 274 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90495</link>
      <description>Exemption benefit could not be denied merely because the assessee had not obtained a licence or followed the prescribed procedure, where the record indicated bona fide ignorance and no intent to evade duty; the demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable. The extended period under section 11A also could not be invoked because the department failed to prove suppression, misstatement, fraud, or deliberate evasion, and the transactions had been accounted for. On both the exemption and limitation issues, the finding was in favour of the assessee and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>