<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90483</link>
    <description>Under an unconditional exemption for copper and aluminium waste and scrap, Modvat credit taken on the input rods and wires does not make the scrap dutiable. Rule 57F(4) applies only where the waste and scrap arising from credit-availing inputs is otherwise liable to duty, and it cannot be used to override an exemption notification. The scrap therefore remained exempt from duty, and the refund claim was held allowable with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90483</link>
      <description>Under an unconditional exemption for copper and aluminium waste and scrap, Modvat credit taken on the input rods and wires does not make the scrap dutiable. Rule 57F(4) applies only where the waste and scrap arising from credit-availing inputs is otherwise liable to duty, and it cannot be used to override an exemption notification. The scrap therefore remained exempt from duty, and the refund claim was held allowable with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>