https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90479 In a central excise dispute over propagated yeast, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal on a prima facie view of the case. The appellant's arguable objections on the marketability of the alleged excisable product, reliance on exemption under Notification No. 217/86, and additional claims regarding adjustment of duty-paid input yeast and availability of Modvat credit were considered sufficient to justify interlocutory relief. The decision reflects that where substantial and debatable issues are raised, pre-deposit may be waived and recovery kept in abeyance until the appeal is heard. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:12:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90479 In a central excise dispute over propagated yeast, the Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal on a prima facie view of the case. The appellant's arguable objections on the marketability of the alleged excisable product, reliance on exemption under Notification No. 217/86, and additional claims regarding adjustment of duty-paid input yeast and availability of Modvat credit were considered sufficient to justify interlocutory relief. The decision reflects that where substantial and debatable issues are raised, pre-deposit may be waived and recovery kept in abeyance until the appeal is heard. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90479