<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90440</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A was held unavailable for inputs cleared under gate passes showing nil duty, because the scheme applies only to duty-paid inputs. Deemed credit under Rule 57G(2) is meant to address cases where duty has in fact been paid but documentary proof is lacking; it does not extend to goods on which no excise duty was paid at all. Notifications supporting deemed credit could not override this basic requirement, so credit was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 415 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90440</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A was held unavailable for inputs cleared under gate passes showing nil duty, because the scheme applies only to duty-paid inputs. Deemed credit under Rule 57G(2) is meant to address cases where duty has in fact been paid but documentary proof is lacking; it does not extend to goods on which no excise duty was paid at all. Notifications supporting deemed credit could not override this basic requirement, so credit was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>