<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 332 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90434</link>
    <description>Rectification is confined to mistakes apparent from the record, so an order cannot be reopened on the basis of a document that was not on record when the decision was made. Here, the Revenue&#039;s appeal had been dismissed for want of proper authorisation, and the signed authorisation was not filed at that stage. Because the alleged error did not emerge from the record as it then stood, no apparent mistake existed that could be corrected through rectification. The Tribunal therefore held that the rectification application was not maintainable and correctly rejected it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 332 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90434</link>
      <description>Rectification is confined to mistakes apparent from the record, so an order cannot be reopened on the basis of a document that was not on record when the decision was made. Here, the Revenue&#039;s appeal had been dismissed for want of proper authorisation, and the signed authorisation was not filed at that stage. Because the alleged error did not emerge from the record as it then stood, no apparent mistake existed that could be corrected through rectification. The Tribunal therefore held that the rectification application was not maintainable and correctly rejected it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>