<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90428</link>
    <description>Penal action for storing exempt intermediate goods outside the factory was unsustainable because the arrangement had been covered by departmental permission, supported by long-standing acquiescence, and the goods moved under challans; the penalty was set aside. Modvat credit on inputs used in glass shells could not be denied merely because the shells were intermediate exempt goods where they fed into dutiable final products, as Rule 57D(2) protected such credit. However, credit attributable to exempt final clearances remained reversible to that limited extent, so the blanket reversal was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh quantification of any reversible portion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90428</link>
      <description>Penal action for storing exempt intermediate goods outside the factory was unsustainable because the arrangement had been covered by departmental permission, supported by long-standing acquiescence, and the goods moved under challans; the penalty was set aside. Modvat credit on inputs used in glass shells could not be denied merely because the shells were intermediate exempt goods where they fed into dutiable final products, as Rule 57D(2) protected such credit. However, credit attributable to exempt final clearances remained reversible to that limited extent, so the blanket reversal was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh quantification of any reversible portion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>