<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90420</link>
    <description>Jet air filters used in a flour mill were classified under Heading 8421 as filtering or purifying machinery because they performed an independent dust-separating and air-cleaning function in the pneumatic conveying system. The material showed that they did not carry out any milling activity, and the HSN notes supported classification of air filters and cyclones used to remove dust from exhaust air under Heading 8421. Section Note 2(a) required goods already covered by a Chapter 84 heading to remain there, while Note 2(b) applied only to true parts used solely or principally with a particular machine. The goods were therefore treated as accessories rather than parts, and Heading 9806 was held inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90420</link>
      <description>Jet air filters used in a flour mill were classified under Heading 8421 as filtering or purifying machinery because they performed an independent dust-separating and air-cleaning function in the pneumatic conveying system. The material showed that they did not carry out any milling activity, and the HSN notes supported classification of air filters and cyclones used to remove dust from exhaust air under Heading 8421. Section Note 2(a) required goods already covered by a Chapter 84 heading to remain there, while Note 2(b) applied only to true parts used solely or principally with a particular machine. The goods were therefore treated as accessories rather than parts, and Heading 9806 was held inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>