<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 276 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90398</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal and cross objections. The decision was based on finding that the demand notices were time-barred by limitation as the provisional assessment was finalized on 27-1-1993. Any subsequent demand should have been issued within six months from this date, as per Sections 18 and 28 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 276 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90398</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal and cross objections. The decision was based on finding that the demand notices were time-barred by limitation as the provisional assessment was finalized on 27-1-1993. Any subsequent demand should have been issued within six months from this date, as per Sections 18 and 28 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>