<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90397</link>
    <description>Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not prescribe a specific limitation for availing notional higher Modvat credit after original credit had already been taken. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that such credit could be taken within a reasonable period and accepted the explanation for the delay. On that basis, the demand for reversal of the notional higher credit was held unsustainable and the lower appellate authority&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90397</link>
      <description>Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not prescribe a specific limitation for availing notional higher Modvat credit after original credit had already been taken. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that such credit could be taken within a reasonable period and accepted the explanation for the delay. On that basis, the demand for reversal of the notional higher credit was held unsustainable and the lower appellate authority&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>