<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90392</link>
    <description>Grinding wheels used in manufacturing motor vehicles and parts were held eligible for Modvat credit because they functioned only as components of larger grinding machinery and could not be used independently. The exclusion under Rule 57A did not apply merely because the goods were described as a tool or part of machinery. On that basis, the disallowance of Modvat credit was set aside and credit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90392</link>
      <description>Grinding wheels used in manufacturing motor vehicles and parts were held eligible for Modvat credit because they functioned only as components of larger grinding machinery and could not be used independently. The exclusion under Rule 57A did not apply merely because the goods were described as a tool or part of machinery. On that basis, the disallowance of Modvat credit was set aside and credit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>