<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90373</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where the assessee had filed classification lists and paid duty on the basis of a tariff publication that contained a misprint, resulting in an incorrect duty rate being declared. The tribunal applied the principle that Rule 173Q does not automatically punish mere incorrectness in a declaration unless the rules expressly make that inaccuracy a penal contravention. On that reasoning, the omission to state the correct rate was not treated as a contravention of Rules 173B, 173F or 173I for penalty purposes, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90373</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where the assessee had filed classification lists and paid duty on the basis of a tariff publication that contained a misprint, resulting in an incorrect duty rate being declared. The tribunal applied the principle that Rule 173Q does not automatically punish mere incorrectness in a declaration unless the rules expressly make that inaccuracy a penal contravention. On that reasoning, the omission to state the correct rate was not treated as a contravention of Rules 173B, 173F or 173I for penalty purposes, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>