<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90358</link>
    <description>Customs exemption notifications must be construed strictly, and the benefit under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. was confined to scientific and technical goods imported by the research institution itself. Although the goods were intended for research use and the notification required certification that they were essential, non-indigenous, and not for commercial activity, the bill of entry, letter of credit, and foreign exchange arrangements showed that a commercial corporation was the importer. Because the notification did not extend to imports made by or on behalf of a research institution, the exemption was not available and duty-free treatment was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 320 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90358</link>
      <description>Customs exemption notifications must be construed strictly, and the benefit under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. was confined to scientific and technical goods imported by the research institution itself. Although the goods were intended for research use and the notification required certification that they were essential, non-indigenous, and not for commercial activity, the bill of entry, letter of credit, and foreign exchange arrangements showed that a commercial corporation was the importer. Because the notification did not extend to imports made by or on behalf of a research institution, the exemption was not available and duty-free treatment was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>