<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90333</link>
    <description>Excise valuation under Section 4 requires evidence of real identity of interest or non-arm&#039;s-length dealing before a buyer can be treated as a related person. Mere family connection between the manufacturer&#039;s directors and the buyer firm&#039;s partners was insufficient, and the buyer&#039;s resale price could not be adopted as the assessable value. On limitation and penalty, filing price lists and the absence of suppression or wilful misstatement negated any basis for the extended period or penal action. The valuation adopted by the department and the penalty demand were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90333</link>
      <description>Excise valuation under Section 4 requires evidence of real identity of interest or non-arm&#039;s-length dealing before a buyer can be treated as a related person. Mere family connection between the manufacturer&#039;s directors and the buyer firm&#039;s partners was insufficient, and the buyer&#039;s resale price could not be adopted as the assessable value. On limitation and penalty, filing price lists and the absence of suppression or wilful misstatement negated any basis for the extended period or penal action. The valuation adopted by the department and the penalty demand were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>