<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90331</link>
    <description>Entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 140/83 turned on whether the assessee had filed the required declaration, and the record showed a carbon copy of the declaration with a related letter bearing the Assistant Collector&#039;s office seal, initials and date. The absence of the declaration from the departmental file was not, by itself, sufficient to disprove filing. Because the authenticity of the seal, initials and receipt of the communication required verification, a factual enquiry was necessary before rejecting the claim. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for factual verification and fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90331</link>
      <description>Entitlement to the benefit of Notification No. 140/83 turned on whether the assessee had filed the required declaration, and the record showed a carbon copy of the declaration with a related letter bearing the Assistant Collector&#039;s office seal, initials and date. The absence of the declaration from the departmental file was not, by itself, sufficient to disprove filing. Because the authenticity of the seal, initials and receipt of the communication required verification, a factual enquiry was necessary before rejecting the claim. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for factual verification and fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>