<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90323</link>
    <description>Precured tread rubber in rolls and sheets was examined for classification under the Central Excise Tariff. An earlier view had placed such goods under Heading 4016.99 based on the Board&#039;s clarification, but the later amendment to Note 9 to Chapter 40 changed the position. On that amended basis, the Tribunal stated that the goods fell within sub-heading 4008.21. The classification issue was therefore resolved in favour of Heading 4008.21, and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90323</link>
      <description>Precured tread rubber in rolls and sheets was examined for classification under the Central Excise Tariff. An earlier view had placed such goods under Heading 4016.99 based on the Board&#039;s clarification, but the later amendment to Note 9 to Chapter 40 changed the position. On that amended basis, the Tribunal stated that the goods fell within sub-heading 4008.21. The classification issue was therefore resolved in favour of Heading 4008.21, and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>