<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 152 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s classification of imported rollers under Tariff Heading 8482.99 as finished roller bearings, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for classification under Tariff Heading 7326.19. The Tribunal noted discrepancies between the appellants&#039; claim of semi-finished goods and the description in shipping documents, finding that the goods were initially declared as finished parts. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a supplier&#039;s clarification and precedent, the Tribunal distinguished the case, emphasizing conflicting descriptions and affirming the Revenue&#039;s classification. The appeal was dismissed, with the initial order deemed appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 152 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s classification of imported rollers under Tariff Heading 8482.99 as finished roller bearings, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for classification under Tariff Heading 7326.19. The Tribunal noted discrepancies between the appellants&#039; claim of semi-finished goods and the description in shipping documents, finding that the goods were initially declared as finished parts. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a supplier&#039;s clarification and precedent, the Tribunal distinguished the case, emphasizing conflicting descriptions and affirming the Revenue&#039;s classification. The appeal was dismissed, with the initial order deemed appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>