https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90298 The appellant successfully appealed the seizure of goods from their truck and the imposition of duty liability, penalty, and redemption fine. The court found that the appellant's driver, who was unaware of the connection between the two companies involved, should not be held accountable for duty liability. The dismissal of the appeal of one company confirmed the separate entity status of the companies, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation of the truck and the redemption fine. The lack of evidence showing knowledge of the companies being one entity resulted in the appeal being allowed. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:44:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90298 The appellant successfully appealed the seizure of goods from their truck and the imposition of duty liability, penalty, and redemption fine. The court found that the appellant's driver, who was unaware of the connection between the two companies involved, should not be held accountable for duty liability. The dismissal of the appeal of one company confirmed the separate entity status of the companies, leading to the setting aside of the confiscation of the truck and the redemption fine. The lack of evidence showing knowledge of the companies being one entity resulted in the appeal being allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90298