<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 108 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90255</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the court found that the order disallowing credit based on invoices issued before the allowed period was passed without jurisdiction and violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in quasi-judicial proceedings and remanded the case for proper observance of natural justice principles, highlighting the need for actions to be within the scope defined by the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner was cautioned for inadequacies in discharging judicial functions, and the case was disposed of with a decision to remand it back for proper observance of legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 108 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90255</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the court found that the order disallowing credit based on invoices issued before the allowed period was passed without jurisdiction and violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in quasi-judicial proceedings and remanded the case for proper observance of natural justice principles, highlighting the need for actions to be within the scope defined by the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner was cautioned for inadequacies in discharging judicial functions, and the case was disposed of with a decision to remand it back for proper observance of legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>