https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90254 The Tribunal considered whether an order directing deposit under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act could be sustained, but it did not examine the merits of the demand or decide whether the amount collected could be treated as duty. It noted the High Court's ruling on Section 11D and also declined to rule on the Department's contention that the provision contains no time limit. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90254 The Tribunal considered whether an order directing deposit under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act could be sustained, but it did not examine the merits of the demand or decide whether the amount collected could be treated as duty. It noted the High Court's ruling on Section 11D and also declined to rule on the Department's contention that the provision contains no time limit. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90254