https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90249 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the applicants in a case involving duty demands and penalties under Rule 209A. The dispute centered on the denial of benefits under Notification 1/93 due to the use of the brand name "Ashok India," claimed by another entity. The Tribunal considered conflicting judicial decisions and circulars clarifying trademark registration, ultimately ordering specific deposit amounts for each applicant and waiving the remaining duty and penalty upon compliance within a specified timeline. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity and transparency in declaring brand name usage for statutory benefits. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:23:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90249 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the applicants in a case involving duty demands and penalties under Rule 209A. The dispute centered on the denial of benefits under Notification 1/93 due to the use of the brand name "Ashok India," claimed by another entity. The Tribunal considered conflicting judicial decisions and circulars clarifying trademark registration, ultimately ordering specific deposit amounts for each applicant and waiving the remaining duty and penalty upon compliance within a specified timeline. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity and transparency in declaring brand name usage for statutory benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90249