<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90243</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the importer and department&#039;s appeals regarding the import of a calendering machine without a license for the packaging material sector. The Tribunal found that the machine did not fall under the exemption for import without a license as argued by the importer. Additionally, the department&#039;s appeal based on under-declaration and manipulation issues not originally raised were not considered valid grounds for overturning the Collector&#039;s decision. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of interpreting policy terms in common understanding and requiring appeals to be directly linked to the original order for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90243</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the importer and department&#039;s appeals regarding the import of a calendering machine without a license for the packaging material sector. The Tribunal found that the machine did not fall under the exemption for import without a license as argued by the importer. Additionally, the department&#039;s appeal based on under-declaration and manipulation issues not originally raised were not considered valid grounds for overturning the Collector&#039;s decision. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of interpreting policy terms in common understanding and requiring appeals to be directly linked to the original order for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>