<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90237</link>
    <description>Facsimile or photocopy versions of ST-39 forms were treated as admissible evidence where the applicable evidence rule allowed reliance on such copies without production of originals, so the absence of original forms did not invalidate the proceedings or create a natural justice issue. The documentary record, including sales tax check-post material, repeated use of the same delivery challans, truck and consignment details, the director&#039;s statement, and unexplained excess stock in the factory, was found to form a consistent pattern supporting clandestine removal of MS Ingots. On that basis, the duty demand, confiscation and penalty were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 220 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90237</link>
      <description>Facsimile or photocopy versions of ST-39 forms were treated as admissible evidence where the applicable evidence rule allowed reliance on such copies without production of originals, so the absence of original forms did not invalidate the proceedings or create a natural justice issue. The documentary record, including sales tax check-post material, repeated use of the same delivery challans, truck and consignment details, the director&#039;s statement, and unexplained excess stock in the factory, was found to form a consistent pattern supporting clandestine removal of MS Ingots. On that basis, the duty demand, confiscation and penalty were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>