<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 217 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90234</link>
    <description>Modvat credit depended on compliance with the prescribed documentary conditions and proof that inputs were received and duty had been paid. Credit on a xerox copy of an invoice was not sustainable on the material available because the original duty-paying document was required, subject only to limited exceptions where loss of the duplicate copy was proved and supporting evidence was produced. By contrast, a later procedural requirement that the dealer maintain a godown could not, by itself, invalidate invoices already issued for Modvat purposes. The actual receipt, transport and use of the goods still had to be verified through documentary proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 217 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90234</link>
      <description>Modvat credit depended on compliance with the prescribed documentary conditions and proof that inputs were received and duty had been paid. Credit on a xerox copy of an invoice was not sustainable on the material available because the original duty-paying document was required, subject only to limited exceptions where loss of the duplicate copy was proved and supporting evidence was produced. By contrast, a later procedural requirement that the dealer maintain a godown could not, by itself, invalidate invoices already issued for Modvat purposes. The actual receipt, transport and use of the goods still had to be verified through documentary proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>