<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 284 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90224</link>
    <description>An appeal and stay petition were kept on record while an application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 remained pending before the appropriate authority. The Tribunal accepted that, in the interests of justice, the matter should not be dismissed at that stage and adjourned it for further action. The operative effect was preservation of the appeal and stay petition pending consideration of the settlement application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 284 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90224</link>
      <description>An appeal and stay petition were kept on record while an application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 remained pending before the appropriate authority. The Tribunal accepted that, in the interests of justice, the matter should not be dismissed at that stage and adjourned it for further action. The operative effect was preservation of the appeal and stay petition pending consideration of the settlement application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>