<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand made without a show cause notice for the period January 1985 to January 1988 was unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s admission of liability and agreement to pay did not waive the requirement for due process. Citing the necessity of issuing show cause notices for raising demands, the Tribunal found the demand unsupported and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:32:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand made without a show cause notice for the period January 1985 to January 1988 was unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s admission of liability and agreement to pay did not waive the requirement for due process. Citing the necessity of issuing show cause notices for raising demands, the Tribunal found the demand unsupported and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>