<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90213</link>
    <description>A declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was produced, and the appellant sought permission to withdraw the central excise appeal. The Tribunal granted leave to withdraw, so the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The document records only the procedural effect of the scheme-based declaration and withdrawal request; it does not decide any substantive excise issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90213</link>
      <description>A declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was produced, and the appellant sought permission to withdraw the central excise appeal. The Tribunal granted leave to withdraw, so the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The document records only the procedural effect of the scheme-based declaration and withdrawal request; it does not decide any substantive excise issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>