<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90204</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed for re-adjudication on classification and duty determination issues. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on &#039;Zinac-22&#039; was allowed, but the appeal on other products&#039; classification was rejected. The adjudicating authority was directed to reassess duty payable, consider Modvat credit eligibility, and impose appropriate penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90204</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed for re-adjudication on classification and duty determination issues. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on &#039;Zinac-22&#039; was allowed, but the appeal on other products&#039; classification was rejected. The adjudicating authority was directed to reassess duty payable, consider Modvat credit eligibility, and impose appropriate penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>