<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90194</link>
    <description>Printed catch covers for medicines were classified by reference to the tariff entry in force during the relevant period. Following earlier decisions on identical goods, the Tribunal held that up to 28-2-1988 the covers fell under sub-heading 4819.13, while for the later period they fell under sub-heading 4819.12. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded only to that extent, with classification differing according to the applicable tariff period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90194</link>
      <description>Printed catch covers for medicines were classified by reference to the tariff entry in force during the relevant period. Following earlier decisions on identical goods, the Tribunal held that up to 28-2-1988 the covers fell under sub-heading 4819.13, while for the later period they fell under sub-heading 4819.12. The Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded only to that extent, with classification differing according to the applicable tariff period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>