<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 282 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90189</link>
    <description>Higher notional Modvat credit was unavailable on bulk drugs received from small scale units because Rule 57B operated subject to Notification No. 175/86. The notification capped credit at the lesser of the concessional duty plus 5% ad valorem or the duty otherwise applicable to the inputs. As the bulk drugs were already subject to the applicable duty rate, the claimed credit would exceed the permitted ceiling and was therefore inadmissible. The claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:34:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 282 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90189</link>
      <description>Higher notional Modvat credit was unavailable on bulk drugs received from small scale units because Rule 57B operated subject to Notification No. 175/86. The notification capped credit at the lesser of the concessional duty plus 5% ad valorem or the duty otherwise applicable to the inputs. As the bulk drugs were already subject to the applicable duty rate, the claimed credit would exceed the permitted ceiling and was therefore inadmissible. The claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>