<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90180</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the request for adjournment and ruled in favor of the appellant by rejecting the allegations of related party transactions. The assessable value was directed to be based on the appellant&#039;s declared price rather than DSSL&#039;s pricing to wholesalers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90180</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the request for adjournment and ruled in favor of the appellant by rejecting the allegations of related party transactions. The assessable value was directed to be based on the appellant&#039;s declared price rather than DSSL&#039;s pricing to wholesalers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>