https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90160 Ex parte appellate orders rejecting the appeals on unjust enrichment were set aside because the appellants had not been given an effective opportunity to present their case. The matters were remanded to the jurisdictional appellate authority for fresh disposal after hearing the appellants and passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The document emphasizes that reconsideration was required in the interest of justice and in light of the settled law on unjust enrichment. en-us Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:18:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90160 Ex parte appellate orders rejecting the appeals on unjust enrichment were set aside because the appellants had not been given an effective opportunity to present their case. The matters were remanded to the jurisdictional appellate authority for fresh disposal after hearing the appellants and passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The document emphasizes that reconsideration was required in the interest of justice and in light of the settled law on unjust enrichment. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90160