https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90140 A statutory capacity-determination communication under the Central Excise regime was treated as an appealable order because it finally fixed capacity and affected duty liability. The Tribunal also held the order unsustainable as it was non-speaking: it was not signed by the prescribed authority, did not deal with the expert inspection or technical report, and ignored the assessee's abatement claim for the period when a smaller furnace was operational. The matter was therefore set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication after supply of relied-upon material and a fresh hearing. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90140 A statutory capacity-determination communication under the Central Excise regime was treated as an appealable order because it finally fixed capacity and affected duty liability. The Tribunal also held the order unsustainable as it was non-speaking: it was not signed by the prescribed authority, did not deal with the expert inspection or technical report, and ignored the assessee's abatement claim for the period when a smaller furnace was operational. The matter was therefore set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication after supply of relied-upon material and a fresh hearing. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90140