<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 269 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90125</link>
    <description>An ex parte dismissal order may be recalled where the appellant shows sufficient cause for non-appearance. Here, the adjournment request was supported by an explanation that the appeal records had been misplaced after transfer and efforts were underway to trace them from regional offices. Those circumstances were accepted as genuine, and the non-appearance was treated as sufficiently explained. The ex parte dismissal was therefore recalled and the appeal restored for final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 269 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90125</link>
      <description>An ex parte dismissal order may be recalled where the appellant shows sufficient cause for non-appearance. Here, the adjournment request was supported by an explanation that the appeal records had been misplaced after transfer and efforts were underway to trace them from regional offices. Those circumstances were accepted as genuine, and the non-appearance was treated as sufficiently explained. The ex parte dismissal was therefore recalled and the appeal restored for final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>