https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90121 A reference application under Section 35G was allowed because the same Modvat credit question on insulated copper cables and wires under Rule 57Q had already been referred to the High Court in an identical matter. The tribunal treated the present controversy as raising the same question of law and directed reference to the High Court, without reopening the merits of the capital goods eligibility issue. The operative effect was that the existing controversy was carried forward for High Court determination rather than decided afresh at this stage. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90121 A reference application under Section 35G was allowed because the same Modvat credit question on insulated copper cables and wires under Rule 57Q had already been referred to the High Court in an identical matter. The tribunal treated the present controversy as raising the same question of law and directed reference to the High Court, without reopening the merits of the capital goods eligibility issue. The operative effect was that the existing controversy was carried forward for High Court determination rather than decided afresh at this stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90121