<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90085</link>
    <description>Clearances made for export were not includible in the aggregate value of clearances under Notification No. 175/86 because the exemption scheme was confined to excisable goods cleared for home consumption. Explanation II governed only the method of computation within that scheme and could not expand it to export clearances in the absence of express wording. The exemption was therefore available to the appellants, since export clearances were excluded from the aggregate value test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90085</link>
      <description>Clearances made for export were not includible in the aggregate value of clearances under Notification No. 175/86 because the exemption scheme was confined to excisable goods cleared for home consumption. Explanation II governed only the method of computation within that scheme and could not expand it to export clearances in the absence of express wording. The exemption was therefore available to the appellants, since export clearances were excluded from the aggregate value test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>