<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90084</link>
    <description>Hexiprep, Hexiscrub and Hexiaqua were treated as surgical disinfectants because their chlorhexidine gluconate content was used for skin and hand disinfection before surgery, and they were classified under CET sub-heading 3808.90 rather than as medicaments. Hexidine was treated as a medicament because it was shown to have therapeutic use for gingivitis, aphthous ulceration and other oral infections, and it fell under CET sub-heading 3003.10 rather than Chapter 33. On limitation, the extended period was held inapplicable because the classification lists and labels had been filed and approved, with no suppression of facts shown; the demand for the relevant period was therefore time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90084</link>
      <description>Hexiprep, Hexiscrub and Hexiaqua were treated as surgical disinfectants because their chlorhexidine gluconate content was used for skin and hand disinfection before surgery, and they were classified under CET sub-heading 3808.90 rather than as medicaments. Hexidine was treated as a medicament because it was shown to have therapeutic use for gingivitis, aphthous ulceration and other oral infections, and it fell under CET sub-heading 3003.10 rather than Chapter 33. On limitation, the extended period was held inapplicable because the classification lists and labels had been filed and approved, with no suppression of facts shown; the demand for the relevant period was therefore time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>