https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90083 A party seeking discretionary stay relief must disclose the full sequence of material events, including earlier pre-deposit directions and related High Court proceedings. Suppression of those facts undermines the request for equitable indulgence, and a tribunal cannot reopen or interfere with a binding High Court direction on pre-deposit. In the stated matter, the stay arrangement was revised and compliance with the pre-deposit condition was enforced, with the assessee directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty within the time fixed. en-us Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:48:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90083 A party seeking discretionary stay relief must disclose the full sequence of material events, including earlier pre-deposit directions and related High Court proceedings. Suppression of those facts undermines the request for equitable indulgence, and a tribunal cannot reopen or interfere with a binding High Court direction on pre-deposit. In the stated matter, the stay arrangement was revised and compliance with the pre-deposit condition was enforced, with the assessee directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty within the time fixed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90083