<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 312 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90074</link>
    <description>Freight and transportation charges incurred after clearance from the factory gate were treated as post-manufacturing expenditure and not part of the assessable value for excise duty. Excise was applied as a levy on manufacture, not on post-clearance profit or later transport costs, and the notice did not allege deliberate depression of price by inflating freight. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 312 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90074</link>
      <description>Freight and transportation charges incurred after clearance from the factory gate were treated as post-manufacturing expenditure and not part of the assessable value for excise duty. Excise was applied as a levy on manufacture, not on post-clearance profit or later transport costs, and the notice did not allege deliberate depression of price by inflating freight. On that basis, the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>