<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 252 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90054</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that Rough Aluminium Castings should not be classified as identifiable parts of machines under Chapter 84 but rather as distinct articles under Heading 7611.00. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial operations to transform the castings into machine parts, distinguishing them from ready-to-use motor vehicle parts. Relying on past judgments and Interpretative Rule 2A, the Tribunal highlighted the multiple processes involved in casting production, concluding that the Collector&#039;s classification was erroneous. The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted, independent of the metal used for the castings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 252 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90054</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that Rough Aluminium Castings should not be classified as identifiable parts of machines under Chapter 84 but rather as distinct articles under Heading 7611.00. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial operations to transform the castings into machine parts, distinguishing them from ready-to-use motor vehicle parts. Relying on past judgments and Interpretative Rule 2A, the Tribunal highlighted the multiple processes involved in casting production, concluding that the Collector&#039;s classification was erroneous. The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted, independent of the metal used for the castings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>