<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 411 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90049</link>
    <description>Machines received before the relevant notification brought the finished product within the Modvat regime were not eligible capital goods for credit under Rule 57Q at the time of receipt. Eligibility had to be determined with reference to the position prevailing when the machines entered the factory, and a later amendment enlarging the scope of capital goods could not retrospectively validate an otherwise ineligible credit claim. The credit was therefore unavailable on the relevant date, and the revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 411 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90049</link>
      <description>Machines received before the relevant notification brought the finished product within the Modvat regime were not eligible capital goods for credit under Rule 57Q at the time of receipt. Eligibility had to be determined with reference to the position prevailing when the machines entered the factory, and a later amendment enlarging the scope of capital goods could not retrospectively validate an otherwise ineligible credit claim. The credit was therefore unavailable on the relevant date, and the revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>