<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90045</link>
    <description>Where goods are sold at different bona fide prices to different classes of buyers, the price charged to industrial consumers cannot automatically be adopted as the assessable value for clearances to independent wholesale dealers at the factory gate. Following its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, the Tribunal accepted that different prices to wholesale dealers and industrial consumers were permissible and that the industrial-consumer price was not the correct basis for valuation of dealer sales. The duty demands founded on that higher price were therefore set aside, and the assessee succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:08:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90045</link>
      <description>Where goods are sold at different bona fide prices to different classes of buyers, the price charged to industrial consumers cannot automatically be adopted as the assessable value for clearances to independent wholesale dealers at the factory gate. Following its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, the Tribunal accepted that different prices to wholesale dealers and industrial consumers were permissible and that the industrial-consumer price was not the correct basis for valuation of dealer sales. The duty demands founded on that higher price were therefore set aside, and the assessee succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>