<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 240 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90040</link>
    <description>A teletypewriter imported for use with an automatic component insertion machine was treated as an accessory because it contributed to the machine&#039;s effective functioning and could feed data into the machine, according to the machine manual. On that basis, it fell within the Open General Licence entry covering the machine with accessories, and the confiscation order could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 240 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90040</link>
      <description>A teletypewriter imported for use with an automatic component insertion machine was treated as an accessory because it contributed to the machine&#039;s effective functioning and could feed data into the machine, according to the machine manual. On that basis, it fell within the Open General Licence entry covering the machine with accessories, and the confiscation order could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>