<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 589 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90035</link>
    <description>Section 3A(4) confers a statutory right to have central excise duty redetermined on the basis of actual production, and that entitlement cannot be curtailed by Rule 96ZO(3). Where an assessee has paid duty under the rule, the Act still governs if Section 3A applies, so assessment must be made with reference to furnace capacity and actual production. The Tribunal followed its earlier un-stayed view and directed remand for fresh determination of capacity and consequential redetermination of duty in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 589 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90035</link>
      <description>Section 3A(4) confers a statutory right to have central excise duty redetermined on the basis of actual production, and that entitlement cannot be curtailed by Rule 96ZO(3). Where an assessee has paid duty under the rule, the Act still governs if Section 3A applies, so assessment must be made with reference to furnace capacity and actual production. The Tribunal followed its earlier un-stayed view and directed remand for fresh determination of capacity and consequential redetermination of duty in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>