<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90032</link>
    <description>Heading 73.08 was not limited to structurals or goods used in structures; it also extended to other articles of iron and steel. On that basis, an electrode casing fell within the heading, so classification under Heading 7308.90 for the period prior to 1-3-1988 was upheld as correct. The Revenue succeeded only on this tariff classification issue, and the wider dispute was treated as academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90032</link>
      <description>Heading 73.08 was not limited to structurals or goods used in structures; it also extended to other articles of iron and steel. On that basis, an electrode casing fell within the heading, so classification under Heading 7308.90 for the period prior to 1-3-1988 was upheld as correct. The Revenue succeeded only on this tariff classification issue, and the wider dispute was treated as academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>