<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90011</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the inputs had already been declared in the assessee&#039;s declaration before credit was taken. The later letter only clarified the earlier declaration and did not change the position that the castings were disclosed in advance. On that factual basis, prior declaration was sufficient and denial of credit was unwarranted; the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90011</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the inputs had already been declared in the assessee&#039;s declaration before credit was taken. The later letter only clarified the earlier declaration and did not change the position that the castings were disclosed in advance. On that factual basis, prior declaration was sufficient and denial of credit was unwarranted; the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>