<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89990</link>
    <description>Duty demand on waste cleared from a unit manufacturing export and domestic goods was held unsustainable where export compliance was established, exports exceeded the prescribed norm, and the waste had been cleared through GP1s. The technical objection that a strict one-to-one correlation could not be made between duty-free inputs for export production and the waste cleared was rejected, because simultaneous production made segregation impracticable and the waste was treated as exempt from duty. The demand was therefore set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 140 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89990</link>
      <description>Duty demand on waste cleared from a unit manufacturing export and domestic goods was held unsustainable where export compliance was established, exports exceeded the prescribed norm, and the waste had been cleared through GP1s. The technical objection that a strict one-to-one correlation could not be made between duty-free inputs for export production and the waste cleared was rejected, because simultaneous production made segregation impracticable and the waste was treated as exempt from duty. The demand was therefore set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>