<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89981</link>
    <description>Roof canopies fitted to tractors at customers&#039; request on an operational basis were held not to form part of the tractor&#039;s assessable value as an essential accessory. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same issue, which had been upheld after the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, and therefore accepted the assessee&#039;s contention. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the canopy was excluded from valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89981</link>
      <description>Roof canopies fitted to tractors at customers&#039; request on an operational basis were held not to form part of the tractor&#039;s assessable value as an essential accessory. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same issue, which had been upheld after the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, and therefore accepted the assessee&#039;s contention. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, and the canopy was excluded from valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>